Posts Tagged ‘fisk’

Robert Fisk, please start a blog!

September 25th, 2008

Pages 30-31 of today’s Independent feature one of the best feature articles I’ve read in a long time. Usually, in a blogpost, I’d link to the article right about now… but it’s not online. I’ll come back to that in a moment.

A couple of days ago I had a bit of a dig at Robert Fisk and his attitudes to online journalism. “To hell with the web,” he said, suggesting a written word in newspaper is more trustworthy and valuable than one on the web.

It’s easy to understand his position. Newspapers are controlled by some very good laws which prevent the publication of libellous and false statements, among other things. At least, that’s what they do in theory (but that’s another debate all together). So it’s fair to see why Mr Fisk would trust newspapers a lot more.

And as for value — I’ve paid a whole quid to read what Fisk has to say. I’d pay nothing to view it online.

But here’s where I am genuinely curious about Mr Fisk’s opinions. As I said in my previous post, the Independent — like most qualities in the UK — doesn’t sell an awful lot each day. Just over 200,000 on average. And not everyone will read everything in the newspaper; especially seeing as Mr Fisk’s feature doesn’t get promoted on the frontpage, or the inside page, or even the front of the World section where it lives. No, the only mention of the article, as far as I can see, is the article itself.

A wasted opportunity? I’d say so.

Robert Fisk’s blog would be brilliant. Stunningly written features like today’s would feature every so often, and short, snappy anecdotal entries about his travels would go inbetween. He could be uploading photos, videos, whatever he pleases.

And we all know it would be brilliant. One of the best. We know we could trust it — the ‘Fisk’ brand is perhaps one of the strongest in journalism. I’d be an instant fan, and so would many more. Thousands more.

Just wait til Digg gets a hold of Mr Fisk’s work. And Matt Drudge. And the rest of the blogosphere. It has the potential to be seen by millions.

I’m sure Mr Fisk got into journalism for the same reasons we all did. To make money. Ha, I’m kidding. We all know the only reason we do this is because we believe we can, with the power of media, change the world. I’m truly baffled that such a brilliant journalist can snub the best way to get his work out there to the masses.

Mr Fisk, if by some form of internet wizardry you read this, I’d like to request that you start a blog. It’s very simple… start here. If you’re too busy, I’ll start it for you.

Robert Fisk: “To hell with the web, it’s got no responsibility”

September 18th, 2008

Legendary reporter Robert Fisk recently gave a public lecture in Wellington, New Zealand, and offered some very strong personal thoughts on web journalism. Newswire reports:

“Mr Fisk said the internet had led to the erosion of quality writing.

He recalled being challenged about a quote of his that had been published on a website – although he had never said it. “But I read it on the internet,” was the response, to which Mr Fisk simply hung up.

Often “misquoted or requoted” on the internet, he is furious when people cut pieces out of what he has said or written, especially if someone uses ellipsis to indicate something has been cut from a quote, when they have actually culled 380 words.

Gordon Campbell – political editor of Scoop and host of the evening – attempted to defend the internet, taking the microphone off Mr Fisk several times to reassure the audience of the benefits of web journalism.

At one point, Mr Fisk retorted: “To hell with the web, it’s got no responsibility.”

I wonder what his problem is. I have always admired Fisk. He’s an exceptional journalist. But like so many exceptional journalists who have earned their living reporting for newspapers, I don’t think he understands what blogs actually are.

Let me ask you this: Why do we report news? To inform, yes. To educate, yes. To apply a sense of public voice… absolutely. For reporters like Robert Fisk, a blog should make him weak at the knees with excitement. If you read Reesh’s piece in full, you’ll come across this statement:

“British-born Fisk (pictured), a journalist who has lived in the Middle East for 30 years, describes as disgraceful a newspaper cutting off the bottom part of a photo of a man holding his dead daughter. By not showing the bone protruding from her leg, the newspaper got away with the caption: ‘A man carries his wounded daughter.’”

With a blog, he could have posted that picture in full.

In fact, everything Fisk claims is wrong about Middle East reporting would be solved if he posted his work on a blog as well as just in a newspaper.

Fisk’s work achieves the goal of informing and educating whoever reads it. But if we’re looking at ABC figures, that puts it at 235,289 on average per day. That’s a very small percentage of a small country.

I say if we, as journalists, are to really do our job as the world’s mouthpiece, then Fisk needs to embrace the web, before the web consumes him.