I’ve always wanted one of those little boxes on the Guardian homepage. Lovely stuff. Read my article about death and social-networking here. Comments are disabled on the piece, so please, if you have any thoughts about it, please get in touch by emailing me or commenting here.
I’ll be posting my newly improved journo-CV on here tomorrow too, so if you’re the sort of person who can give me a job, email me. Yes!









Reports of her death are greatly exaggerated
January 26th, 2009Without wanting to seem flippant over this tragic story, I couldn’t help notice something very strange on on the Daily Mail site today.
Other than being a very good piece of SEO, this headline is also very matter of fact. The Miss World finalist has died.
And then here’s the first paragraph:
Very straight forward there.
Like most Daily Mail stories, there are comments a plenty (probably down to that great SEO). But something about the comments on this story in particular struck me as a little bit, well, strange:
And another:
And there’s loads more.
Of course, the reasonable explanation for this is that the original story told of a girl fighting for her life. The comments came in. Then, sadly, the girl lost that fight — and so the story was altered. But now the comments come across as rather haunting. I’ve stuck a picture of the comments on Flickr in the event of them being removed.
Presumably the Mail would have wanted to keep the most up-to-date information on one article page, rather than several new articles whenever a story develops. That makes sense. But surely a development as serious as the death of the subject shouldn’t just be edited?
No comments »
Posted in Comment, Ethics, Newspapers, Tabloids, The Web
Tags: comments daily mail death miss world