-
- Online comment-writers to get own internet | Daily Mash May 17, 2012
- For the first time, whites account for less than half of US births | NYTimes.com May 17, 2012
- Joey Barton uses Promoted Tweets to apologise for red card - Digital-Football.com May 14, 2012
- "Do please feel free to cheer for our driver" May 14, 2012
- Rage Comics Turn Everyday Stress Into Laughs - NYTimes.com May 11, 2012
- Index Ventures Blog – Who Will Open The London IPO Window? May 11, 2012
- One Per Cent: Flap around London with the Pigeon Simulator April 26, 2012
- "I hate that there is a generation of new reporters joining news sites not to break stories but to..." April 20, 2012
- Recently
- Flickr









- Archives
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- October 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
Reports of her death are greatly exaggerated
January 26th, 2009Without wanting to seem flippant over this tragic story, I couldn’t help notice something very strange on on the Daily Mail site today.
Other than being a very good piece of SEO, this headline is also very matter of fact. The Miss World finalist has died.
And then here’s the first paragraph:
Very straight forward there.
Like most Daily Mail stories, there are comments a plenty (probably down to that great SEO). But something about the comments on this story in particular struck me as a little bit, well, strange:
And another:
And there’s loads more.
Of course, the reasonable explanation for this is that the original story told of a girl fighting for her life. The comments came in. Then, sadly, the girl lost that fight — and so the story was altered. But now the comments come across as rather haunting. I’ve stuck a picture of the comments on Flickr in the event of them being removed.
Presumably the Mail would have wanted to keep the most up-to-date information on one article page, rather than several new articles whenever a story develops. That makes sense. But surely a development as serious as the death of the subject shouldn’t just be edited?
1 comment »
Posted in Comment, Ethics, Newspapers, Tabloids, The Web
Tags: comments daily mail death miss world