<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave Lee / jBlog &#187; nuj</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveleejblog.com/category/nuj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveleejblog.com</link>
	<description>Fresh ideas for online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 11:42:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NUJ on BNP: Putting words in journalists&#8217; mouths</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/10/nuj-on-bnp-putting-words-in-journalists-mouths/</link>
		<comments>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/10/nuj-on-bnp-putting-words-in-journalists-mouths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbcqt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick griffin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[question time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=1012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the National Union of Journalists today:
We believe the BBC is wrong to invite the BNP to appear on Question Time and will support any member who refuses to work on this week&#8217;s programme in line with the union&#8217;s code of conduct and conscience clause.

The NUJ applauds journalists in the BBC and elsewhere around the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 525px"><img src="http://www.ncl-coll.ac.uk/dev/ncl-college/web-build/media/editor/BBC%20%27Question%20Time%27%20at%20Newcastle%20College%20001(1).jpg" alt="Calm down dear, its only a political debate!" width="515" height="257" /><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;Calm down dear, it&#39;s only a political debate!&quot;</p></div>
<p>From <a href="http://www.nuj.org.uk/innerPagenuj.html?docid=1381">the National Union of Journalists today</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>We believe the BBC is wrong to invite the BNP to appear on Question Time and will support any member who refuses to work on this week&#8217;s programme in line with the union&#8217;s code of conduct and conscience clause.</p>
<div style="position: relative; top: -8px;">
<p>The NUJ applauds journalists in the BBC and elsewhere around the UK who are subjecting the BNP’s racist propaganda to professional scrutiny &#8211; and exposing their lies where they find them.</p>
<p>There is no opportunity for this sort of forensic examination in the knock-about soapbox environment of Question Time.</p></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Interesting. I&#8217;m not here to debate the presence of the BNP on QT. Indeed, this post should stand whether I agree <em>or </em>disagree.</p>
<p>My issue is with the NUJ deciding to speak on behalf of its members without having asked them in the first place.</p>
<p>If public opinion polls are to be believed, the nation is around 60 per cent in favour of the BBC&#8217;s decision. Therefore, it&#8217;s likely a sizable portion of NUJ members are in favour too.</p>
<p>Not all, maybe not even a majority, but enough to question the NUJ&#8217;s judgment in declaring the Union as a whole is against the show.</p>
<p>By releasing a statement like this, its effectively putting words into its members&#8217; mouths without asking permission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/10/nuj-on-bnp-putting-words-in-journalists-mouths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

