Archive for the ‘Design’ category

What a difference a video makes

March 1st, 2008

What a week.

Monday saw my first ever lecture. Kristine Lowe explained to the students why we should all blogging. The ‘Do’s and Don’t’s of Blogging’ was my part — I spoke for 20 or so minutes. I think it went down well: a good new Lincoln blog appeared the next day. I’m glad at least one person caught the ‘buzz’.

My lecturers had some very kind comments for me afterwards, which I’m delighted about. It certainly bodes well for my New Zealand trip in May.

Hopefully by Monday I’ll have a recording of my talk, so I can stick it up on here for you all to enjoy/disagree with!

Then we had an earthquake. Awesome. I was up in my room at the time, about to go to bed, when all the empty cans on my desk rattled about and fell off, and then it got even more violent. In case you haven’t heard, Lincoln was right on top of the epicentre, so we got a good hit. All very exciting.

Then I posted THAT video. I remember thinking, at the time, that if I could get the video online quickly I’d stand a good chance of getting some hits in.

And then it all kicked off.

I woke up in the morning to find 20 emails from YouTube. Comments… and plenty of ‘em. It’s really quite funny, apparently, and I started to wonder quite how far this might all go.

Then I got a message from Julian March, saying how much he enjoyed it, and that he’d love to mention it on the Sky News Editors’ Blog. Which he did. I did what every cheeky student journalist should do in this situation — and applied for some work experience.

Then the Guardian got involved. “Give them a job at sky,” says the post on the Media Monkey blog. Couldn’t agree more, chaps.

Then, through the wonderful medium that is Facebook, I got this message: “In case no-one from Sky has got in touch with you to let you know, your video has caused a great deal of amusement within the newsroom. As I’m sure you can imagine, Sky likes nothing better than to beat the BBC to a story.”

That was from the Sky News presenter that night, Faye Barker.

Some more blogs got going. Journalism.co.uk wrote about it (although, mysteriously, the entry has now gone). Paul Bradshaw added his thoughts on the matter here.

Perhaps the most bizarre reaction was from a group of Sunderland students who emailed with some great comments after seeing the clip in a lecture. “I have been in a lecture since nine this morning, i’m tried, i’m irritable and I havn’t washed in days. But by god, the video you posted made me forget all my sorrows and now I feel clean again! Thanks for the emotional wash Dave pet,” wrote Lisa, who gloriously added ‘pet’ at the end too. Love it.

Back to Sky. I was contacted by Rob Kirk — editorial development manager for Sky News — who asked me to give him a call. Last time I’d spoken to Rob was while he was on his holidays, I was covering a story for Press Gazette about an internship he was running. Anyway, I gave him a ring, and he has asked if he can use the clip in a promotional video for Sky. Unbelievable.

Even more unbelievable is that he has invited me down for the day, and also offered to try and fit me in for some work experience in the near future; hopefully around Easter.

Which, I don’t really have to tell you, excites me a lot. Especially when I hear that they’ve been inspired by Jeff Jarvis this week. It seems that Sky might be the newsroom I’ve dreamed of: Multimedia everywhere. I’m not sure what I could possibly contribute to the whole situation, but I’m certainly looking forward to visiting. Just the very nature Sky got in touch tells me they are all tuned in: Julian sent a private message on YouTube, and Faye used Facebook. Says a lot, I think.
To top off the week (which, by the way, included a 2000 word essay and an ‘interview’ assessment day…. I almost forgot my course existed until they came along and knocked me into shape..), we did the SU Election Liveblog for the newspaper. And it went extremely well — some really good content, and over 2000 hits. A great result.

In retrospect, this whole affair with the video has been a strange one. I stick by the reasons for making the video — I still find it shocking — but do feel a bit ‘dirty’ for slating the BBC. It’s like the England football team. Sometimes I’m flabbergasted at how awful they are yet, after a good sleep, I find myself supporting them even more.

I could make a 2-hour long video about all the things the BBC does brilliantly. Better than Sky. It just so happened that on this occasion the BBC fell on their face in a massive way. I’m yet to hear any response from BBC, but this blog has been linked to via this url which I can’t access. It’s the BBC’s intranet. I’m dying to know what’s being said — so if anyone can find out, that would be great.

To finish this point on a lighter note, I’d like to tell a little story. I work, part time, at a Staples store in Lincoln. It’s a dull job, but one thing happened today that will live with me forever.

We’ve just had CCTV installed, and like many places, we have a monitor at the front of the store to make it obvious people are being filmed. Today, a little lad aged about 4 or 5, saw this screen. Like most children, he found it fascinating. Unlike most children, however, this particular lad found that the funnest use of this technology was to, er, drop his trousers. Bless the little fella. I hope for his sake he eventually grows out of it.

Give us a Kiss

July 25th, 2007

Remember me telling you the other day that you should never mix your personal life with your journalism stuff if you’re a blogging student?

Well I take it back. A little. If you’re cool enough, you can get away with it, just like Jemima Kiss.

It’s the greatest blog design I’ve ever seen (even though it is a tincy bit wide).

50,000 Guardians… how many more?

June 11th, 2007

Today marks the 50,000th edition of The Guardian.

It has, for the last two years or so, been my newspaper of choice for most days of the week.

That’s not important. What is important is that with anniversaries such as this, it gives us a chance to look back at the legacy of The Guardian.

Last Saturday, we were treated to a pull-out showing some of the major front pages in the paper’s long history. Looking at these, two things were apparent:

1. The Berliner wasn’t a success

Yes, it looks very pretty and is easier to read on the train; but now The Guardian looks like a cross between a parish newsletter and a lifestyle magazine. The look has had an effect on the content too. G2 seems to get fluffier by the day. I’m not asking for serious features everyday, but I can’t remember the last time I read a good hard-hitting feature.

When something shocking/important happens, I instinctively find myself reaching for The Times instead.

2. Tabloids act as a far greater chronicle of history, and will live on

For Christmas, I was given a really impressive looking book with replica copies of tabloids on the day major sporting stories broke. If there’s one thing the tabloids do well it’s reflect public opinion like no other medium — even the internet. It’s the newspapers’ trump card, maybe the only one they have left.

The ‘quality’ dailies need to learn how to do this. They can without dumbing down. They can without burying their opinions on page 20. Comment pages in the qualities are extremely poor. Sometimes two or three columnists will focus on the same issue of the day. While it’s good to have some great analysis on a major event, this seems to happen every time Gordon Brown/David Cameron makes a speech. The Guardian has plenty of comment out there, Comment is Free is evidence of that.

In my view, if quality dailies are going to survive, they need to take one course of action out of a possible two. These are:

Either…

- Do more of what they’re good at already. Media on a Monday, Technology on a Thursday, Film on a Friday. All fantastic sections from The Guardian. The Times’ football coverage on a Monday is exceptional. The New York Times pullout in The Observer is a bit odd, but still nice to read.

If they pick certain subjects and cover them in a way no other place can, then the readers will come flocking.

Or… 

- Not be afraid to say what they think. The Independent knows how get its views across. It’s effective. If you agree with the Indy’s point of view, you feel empowered. If you disagree, then you still read it anyway. The important point here is that you’re reading the thing regardless.

A sickening logo, and a [sic]kening response

June 5th, 2007

There; much better. I love how people get overly worked up about things like this. I’m especially happy now that I have a place where all those idiotic comments can be published for the whole world to see.

Here’s some of my favourites:

“Do the decent thing and give us a logo we can be proud of and not this national embarrassment.”

It’s not really that embarrassing, is it? No.

“The logo lacks elegance and style; two British attributes we are very fond of. Its cheesy and not at all professional – we’ll be the laughing stock of all who see it!”

Hmmm. I think more people will laugh when they see how much of a fuss has been made over it.

The Olympic logo is just like Britain these days — second rate!! One we were a proud nation, proud of our herriatage and everything we stood for. I feel ashamed to say that I am British if that monstrosity is the best we can come up with! If this is going to be a symbol of Britains Olymics, then I truly don’t want to be British any longer. “

I mean honestly — what a complete nonce. They’re not my spelling mistakes by the way. I just can’t be bothered being [sic] all over it.
Gotta love this one though:

“400 grand? I could have achieved the same thing with 10 pints of lager and a kebab.”

Ha!

Sure, I don’t like the logo. It’s naff. But I’m not losing sleep over it. I’m not packing my bags and un-Britishing myself because some designer got it wrong. If there’s one thing that this logo tells us all, it’s that British people are just completely silly.

All kicking off at UCLan

April 12th, 2007

I’ve just read this post by a good friend Ed Walker over on the Pluto Editor’s Blog.

Seems a fellow student at UCLan lifted some text from a Press Gazette article by Martin Stabe. Naughty naughty.

Martin’s post on the matter can be found here. The comments are well worth reading. Most defend the Journalism School at UCLan — rightly so, it’s brilliant from what I’ve heard — and some rightly slate the guilty student/blogger.

I’m shocked at the student in question. Whether first, second or third year, this sort of thing is unforgivable. I was told it was unacceptable to copy work when I was 4 years old. It doesn’t take a lecturer to remind me of that basic moral.

One particular comment from Graham caught my eye:

Apart from a few notable exceptions I would guess that the majority of journalism lecturers in the UK probably don’t know much about blogs and how the whole social net thing meshes together and what that means for publishing. This will obviously have an impact on the quality of teaching.

Mmmm, indeed. Although I’ve been happy with my course at Lincoln, my major complaint is the lack of teaching on this area of online journalism.

A while ago, before the start of the current semester, I posted a blog outlining my worries and concerns over my online module. At the time I promised to put my argument to my online tutor and post the reply.

Well I’m glad to say I did do that, but am yet to post his reply. I will very soon but only once I’ve been given my marks. I’m no fool. :-)

If anyone is interested in reading them, however, pop me an email and I’ll send you the information I received.

For the time being, please find my email to the University, in full, pasted below.

UPDATE: Change of plan, Wordpress won’t seem to let me post the email (it’s a bit funny like that), so I’ll stick it up at the weekend. In the mean time, if anyone is curious, I can email it to them whenever they wish.

Compelling BBC, Seattle services, and a boring snuff movie

December 22nd, 2006

Despite all its annoyances (which I’ll no doubt talk about another time), you really can’t beat rolling news when a story is about to unfold. The Suffolk Murders reached a major point tonight with the announcement that a 43 year-old man named Steve Wright (left) has been charged with the murder of all five women.

Shamefully, I’ve forgotten the name of the BBC News correspondent that covered the press conference at 10.15 tonight, but he made it compelling viewing. A big rarity, in my opinion, as it’s hard to keep interest up when you’re essentially just a bloke in a room, waiting for more blokes in a room to turn up….to the room. Good viewing – and well handled by the BBC.

I have to say, though, that they poorly balanced the coverage of Richard Hammond’s interview. Yes, we’re all happy that he’s back and a-ok. But, it didn’t warrant the coverage it did. They went even further to suggest the “pictures” [of the interview] were exclusive. Well of course they were. The BBC giving the BBC an exclusive. Bravo.
The short news piece on the license fee increase was fairly balanced – which must be tricky for them – but ruined in a moment when the analyst on News 24 mistakenly said “we” when trying to be unbiased.

Tomorrow will bring countless reports on Steve Wright. Interesting to see how the tabloids handle it, considering the request by the Crown Prosecution Service to tread carefully. ‘Innocent until proven guilty’ isn’t a mantra that the red tops tend to stick to – but I’ll be cautiously optimistic that the wishes of the police are met.

This caught my eye too. Those poor folks in Seattle (as George Bush would probably say) have been without electricity for some while now. A day or two ago even the printing presses were shut down because of outages with the major publications, The Seattle Times and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer*, releasing the days pages on the web for free. Very noble, but then you could argue that without electricity, access to the web is rather tricky.

Anyway, today, the Seattle Times is back in action, and with it a very interesting front page. The top half of the front page is dedicated to public service messages for the affected public. Not only that, but the same messages are written in six different languages.

Often we look to photos or eyewitness accounts to fill pages in a disaster (who can forget the images on Sept 12th 2001, for example), but this for me remains equally as poignant.

Poynter Online discusses the design issues with the page here, if you’re interested. Even if you’re not, the Poynter set of sites is brilliant, and well worth a look.

In the mean time, I’m left watching Hollyoaks in the City. A horrible program. I love Hollyoaks – a hell of a lot, trust me – but something about this post-watershed version makes me cringe. It’s as if the Channel Four executives have said, “Right, everyone, it’s late night…what’s the most controversial thing you can think of?”

The synopsis of this episode (according to Tiscali’s guide) is, brace yourselves, that Lisa is taken to a warehouse, only to find that she is now in a snuff movie. Wow. And Troy, poor Troy, has now found that his family have witnessed his gay porn movie that has found its way onto the internet.

They’re trying to be imaginative – but it comes across as just, well, lazy.

Goodnight!

(Thanks to News Designer for information in this post)

*Intelligencer?! That’s a new one to me!