<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1-0 to the Evening Standard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveleejblog.com/2009/05/1-0-to-the-evening-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/05/1-0-to-the-evening-standard/</link>
	<description>Fresh ideas for online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 18:37:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sorry, Evening Standard</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/05/1-0-to-the-evening-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-2254</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorry, Evening Standard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=955#comment-2254</guid>
		<description>[...] commentators offered cautious praise: on his personal blog the BBC’s Dave Lee felt that it was 1-0 to the Evening Standard, while the Guardian&#8217;s Stephen Brook, having reacted badly to the front page and asked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] commentators offered cautious praise: on his personal blog the BBC’s Dave Lee felt that it was 1-0 to the Evening Standard, while the Guardian&#8217;s Stephen Brook, having reacted badly to the front page and asked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

