The depressing but inevitable demise of Press Gazette

April 6th, 2009 by Dave Leave a reply »

Today, Wilmington Media announced that Press Gazette, the UK’s journalism trade mag, will be closing.

It’s a sad day — Press Gazette has been a part of many a journalist’s career, from the Grey Cardigan column keeping the old-timers happy, to the Knowledge section showing newcomers the way to go.

I’m proud to say I contributed plenty to the magazine. First, as student on work experience. Being on the newsdesk of what was already a shrinking staff gave me plenty of opportunities. And as I wrote up notes on the train home I realised that I was improving as a journalist with every day I spent there.

There were signs of discontent when I was on my placement. While looking through the paper archives, I was struck by how the print product had evolved in such a short time. Gone was the slick, filled-to-the-brim magazine that screamed “finger” and “pulse” at you. In its place had arrived a cheap-feeling, awkward publication that resembled an internal staff newsletter.

I was told, way back in 2007, that the British Press Awards — the magazine’s big event of the year — was what was keeping PG alive and well. Well, alive at least. It was a real money spinner. Should the awards go, then the magazine would almost certainly go with it. It’s no coincidnce that the Awards happened last week. One last hurrah.

I made some great contacts. Martin Stabe, the then online editor (who is now at Retail Week), gave me what was essentially my first big break by linking to my site from his widely read blog. I repayed this favour by calling him Michael. D’oh. Martin managed to hook me up as the magazine’s Student Journalism blogger — my first regular paid gig.

After university, Martin gave me my second big break, putting me in touch with Nick Reynolds at the BBC. That contact led to my current job on the BBC Internet Blog. I hope and believe that if I play my cards right, I could well end up working for the BBC for the rest of my life.

There’s no doubt that I wouldn’t be in the position I am now without the help of Martin and Press Gazette.

But in more recent times, my relationship with the magazine has been seriously tarnished.

Fast forward from 2007 to last summer. After a month or so of unemployed panic, I was excited to learn that Press Gazette were hiring a reporter. Brilliant news for me — I knew most of the staff, knew the beat, had the skills and even the contacts.

Encouragingly, two members of staff emailed to suggest  I go ahead and apply.

I was confident. In reality, I should have been sceptical. The position I was filling was that of Patrick Smith — who grabbed a great spot on PaidContent. They needed a replacement, or so I thought.

I’d decided I didn’t want the job about five minutes into the interview. I was told that they didn’t actually know if they were hiring anyone. What they’d prefer to do was extend the hours of an existing member of staff from three days (if I remember correctly) to five days. Fair enough — although it would have been a good idea to work their budgets out before advertising for a full time reporter.

But I could let that go detail go. What I couldn’t let go was what happened next. I was offered another placement — maybe (yes, maybe) with expenses. Incredibly insulting — I’d gone from applying for a job to being offered some work experience. To quote a tabloid sensation who is no longer with us: “‘Ave I got ‘MUG’ written on my ‘ead?”

I didn’t. I turned down the placement (or rather, scooted around the offer) and said I was interested in the paid position, thanks. They said they’d let me know.

Weeks passed, and nothing. Nothing until the leaving do of Patrick, which I was invited along to. On the day of his departure, I got a call at about half five letting me know I didn’t get the job. I’m guessing the editor suddenly realised it would be a good idea to tell me before I went to to the pub. After all, everyone there would be congratulating the successful applicant. Or rather, the reporter who got two extra days a week.

I wonder how long it would have taken had I not gone to wish Patrick well?

But that’s besides the point. What that whole furore told me about Press Gazette is that it was a publication in complete disarray. My experiences were just one part of a big mess that started from the very top and tumbled down. It was a publication that lacked direction, ideas and, crucially, money. As a freelance, I’ve waited over 8 months to be paid by them, contiually emailing and ringing to get it sorted out. Only to learn the best way to deal with the unprofessionalism (of their accounts, not the journalists) was to have a great old rant on Twitter.

A great shame. Journalism needs publications like Press Gazette, but long gone are the days where it had any real drive or clout. MediaGuardian, big in budget, has flattened it into a mere pancake of irrelevance.

Is it risky to have the dominant media publication tied to a newspaper? Probably, but MediaGuardian still reports discontent at the Guardian Media Group, so, on the surface at least, it seems to be ok. And if not, bloggers and other sites can make up the gap.

Maybe Press Gazette will rise up from the dead like it has done in the past — but I don’t see it. This collapse goes well beyond the credit crunch. A magazine that I held in very high regard has fallen from a once great height, leaving me with a very bitter taste in my mouth.

The journalists at PG only found out of the closure today too. Not surprising — given my experience there. I wish them all the very best of luck finding other work — when you look at the size of the staff, to put out that much good content was an amazing effort, and they all deserve to be better paid and appreciated.

There’ll be coos of nostalgia for Press Gazette in the press for the next few days, but, with tinges of regret, it really is time to let it go. They say the website will remain, but I think we all know it’ll just be the job site and little else. Roy Greenslade has put out this plea for a buyer — but I don’t think any publishers will touch it.

Share this post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
Advertisement

11 comments

  1. Memories, Dave!
    Enjoyed this. But one point of discussion — the awards live on, the BPA and Regional Press Awards at least. They are profitable and Wilmington most definitely wants to keep hold of them. You might even ask whether the events were the main reason it’s board green lighted the PG purchase in the first place.
    Cheers,

    http://www.paidcontent.co.uk/entry/419-press-gazette-shuts-print-edition-staff-jobs-not-safe-online-future-unc/

    Patrick Smith’s last blog post..Press Gazette Shuts Mag, Mothballs Website; Editorial Staff Laid Off

  2. Alan Dean says:

    Nice obit, Dave. Pity to see Press Gazette go, but its regular reporting on the demise of media around the UK and elsewhere of late was surely a sign of what was to come.

    Your personal experience with management made me think immediately of a bald-headed barber, a dentist with bad teeth, or a travel agent who screws up his own holiday: a mag for journos should have been run on a much more professional basis.

    My own connection with what was once known as the UKPG started back in the late 60’s when I was a stringer working on a retainer for the Daily Mail in Belgrade (I did say it was the 60s….) I ran into the editor of the UKPG at the time in the Bunch of Grapes while visiting London and was asked if I would file the odd piece on the East European media scene — and was paid promptly for each item: a meagre sum, but the check was always in the post.

    Later as deputy editor of an Antwerp-based news magazine (the much-maligned To The Point International) I poached the then editor of the UKPG, David North, to head up our subs table.

    As somebody once sang: Those were the days, my friend. We thought they’d never end……

  3. paul says:

    Some rewriting of history there. They gave the job go me – i wasn’t a member of staff who got their hours extended. I was a freelance and applied for the job in the same way as you.

    Paul ‘pancake of irrelevance’ mcnally.

  4. Dave says:

    @paul,

    It’s not re-writing history really, is it? You were freelance, yes, but it was regular weekly work (or at least, that’s how at it was described to me).

    So rather than having you as freelance, and then hire a new member of staff (as the job advert suggested), they decided to just offer you the full time job.

    All well and good — it’s not the job I’m complaining about here — it was more the manner in which I went from being invited for a job interview, to being told there was no job, to then being offered work experience… and then only being told I didn’t have the job when it was clear I’d be going to the pub.

    Rather than getting a new reporter in to replace Patrick, they essentially just extended other hours.

    Luckily for Press Gazette, the journalism skills on show were far superior than the management would suggest.

    Which part of history have I rewritten?

  5. paul says:

    ah, then it was described to you wrongly. There was no regular work agreement with them. Not disputing the rest: a sadly accurate description of how things were run. But I have to correct you on the suggestion that I was some kind of shoein for the job.

  6. Dave says:

    I didn’t intend to suggest you had a shoe-in (and looking over the post, I don’t think I did).

    But the situation was that by taking on a freelancer full time, they were saving on paying a new member of staff… and probably paying a little less (compared to daily freelance rates) for each day’s work too.

    This was explained to me — in those exact terms — in my interview.

Leave a Reply