<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When webcams go bad: Priceless abuse of BBC Nottingham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/</link>
	<description>Fresh ideas for online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wii</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/comment-page-1/#comment-12937</link>
		<dc:creator>Wii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=768#comment-12937</guid>
		<description>In the awesome design of things you receive  a B- just for effort and hard work. Exactly where you actually confused me personally ended up being on your particulars. As as the maxim goes, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more accurate here. Having said that, allow me reveal to you exactly what did deliver the results. The authoring is actually extremely persuasive which is possibly the reason why I am taking the effort to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, although I can certainly notice the leaps in logic you come up with, I am definitely not convinced of how you seem to unite your points which inturn make the actual conclusion. For the moment I shall yield to your position however hope in the future you actually link your dots much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the awesome design of things you receive  a B- just for effort and hard work. Exactly where you actually confused me personally ended up being on your particulars. As as the maxim goes, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more accurate here. Having said that, allow me reveal to you exactly what did deliver the results. The authoring is actually extremely persuasive which is possibly the reason why I am taking the effort to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, although I can certainly notice the leaps in logic you come up with, I am definitely not convinced of how you seem to unite your points which inturn make the actual conclusion. For the moment I shall yield to your position however hope in the future you actually link your dots much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wii</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/comment-page-1/#comment-12936</link>
		<dc:creator>Wii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=768#comment-12936</guid>
		<description>In the great pattern of things you receive  an A with regard to hard work. Exactly where you lost me personally was first on the details. As they say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be more correct at this point. Having said that, let me reveal to you just what did deliver the results. The article (parts of it) can be rather convincing and this is possibly why I am taking an effort in order to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, even though I can easily see the jumps in logic you make, I am not necessarily sure of how you appear to unite your details which inturn make your conclusion. For now I shall yield to your position but hope in the near future you connect the facts better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the great pattern of things you receive  an A with regard to hard work. Exactly where you lost me personally was first on the details. As they say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be more correct at this point. Having said that, let me reveal to you just what did deliver the results. The article (parts of it) can be rather convincing and this is possibly why I am taking an effort in order to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, even though I can easily see the jumps in logic you make, I am not necessarily sure of how you appear to unite your details which inturn make your conclusion. For now I shall yield to your position but hope in the near future you connect the facts better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaming</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/comment-page-1/#comment-12935</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=768#comment-12935</guid>
		<description>Along with every thing that appears to be building throughout this specific subject matter, your opinions happen to be rather exciting. Even so, I appologize, because I can not subscribe to your entire strategy, all be it exciting none the less. It appears to everybody that your remarks are generally not completely validated and in reality you are generally your self not entirely convinced of your assertion. In any case I did appreciate reading through it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along with every thing that appears to be building throughout this specific subject matter, your opinions happen to be rather exciting. Even so, I appologize, because I can not subscribe to your entire strategy, all be it exciting none the less. It appears to everybody that your remarks are generally not completely validated and in reality you are generally your self not entirely convinced of your assertion. In any case I did appreciate reading through it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iphone 5 release</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/comment-page-1/#comment-10959</link>
		<dc:creator>Iphone 5 release</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 11:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=768#comment-10959</guid>
		<description>There are rumors that the iPhone five wil use qualcom chips which can do both equally CDMA and GSM networks. Apple constantly hates item fragmentation. So if they could get a mobile phone that would operate on both networks, I&#039;m positive they will do it..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are rumors that the iPhone five wil use qualcom chips which can do both equally CDMA and GSM networks. Apple constantly hates item fragmentation. So if they could get a mobile phone that would operate on both networks, I&#8217;m positive they will do it..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vehicle registration search</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/comment-page-1/#comment-8569</link>
		<dc:creator>vehicle registration search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 04:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=768#comment-8569</guid>
		<description>Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an extremely long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn&#039;t appear. Grrrr... well I&#039;m not writing all that over again. Regardless, just wanted to say great blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an extremely long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn&#8217;t appear. Grrrr&#8230; well I&#8217;m not writing all that over again. Regardless, just wanted to say great blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trenton Orewiler</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/comment-page-1/#comment-3683</link>
		<dc:creator>Trenton Orewiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=768#comment-3683</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s good, i&#160;like livechat girls,they aresex.
i like your think</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s good, i&nbsp;like livechat girls,they aresex.<br />
i like your think</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usb webcam</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/comment-page-1/#comment-3373</link>
		<dc:creator>usb webcam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=768#comment-3373</guid>
		<description>Laugh as much as you breathe and love as long as you live.At least thats what i do. Andreea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laugh as much as you breathe and love as long as you live.At least thats what i do. Andreea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webcams</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/comment-page-1/#comment-2124</link>
		<dc:creator>webcams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=768#comment-2124</guid>
		<description>That is some artwork, must have taken ages to get it right....perhaps he watched himself doing it with an iphone so he could tell how high and low to go? classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is some artwork, must have taken ages to get it right&#8230;.perhaps he watched himself doing it with an iphone so he could tell how high and low to go? classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lee: Cunning stunt targets BBC webcam &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/02/when-webcams-go-bad-priceless-abuse-of-bbc-nottingham/comment-page-1/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lee: Cunning stunt targets BBC webcam &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=768#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>[...] Full story at this link&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Full story at this link&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

