<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s decide: Newspapers or democracy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveleejblog.com/2009/01/lets-decide-newspapers-or-democracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/01/lets-decide-newspapers-or-democracy/</link>
	<description>Fresh ideas for online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 18:37:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/01/lets-decide-newspapers-or-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=592#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>Democracy, of course.

Print used to have the monopoly on advertising - now the internet does.  Now there is billions of sites to stick adverts on - thus the price of advertising has been driven down.  

So where is the money going to come from to fund massive, massive journalism projects?

Print and online combined, I suspect.  I think print sales will stabalise soon and maybe even increase.  Most people just don&#039;t find reading online a great pleasure - the computer still has that awkward and annoying slight control over the user - scrolling, clicking, &#039;not responding&#039; etc.  You cannot lie down in a comy position with a wacking great laptop on your bed/in your bath.

As for nifty hand held thingys - too expensive - and who wants to read The NYT on a five inch screen - blah!

I went and bought the Economist today, and the Guardian.  Why?  Because I had a thirst for something with depth and quality - all within my control, in my hands.  The pleasure of reading them online would be not pleasurable at all.  

Thus - allthough current sales and doom mongers reflect otherwise - print will always be in demand.

There you go, sorted - lol!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democracy, of course.</p>
<p>Print used to have the monopoly on advertising &#8211; now the internet does.  Now there is billions of sites to stick adverts on &#8211; thus the price of advertising has been driven down.  </p>
<p>So where is the money going to come from to fund massive, massive journalism projects?</p>
<p>Print and online combined, I suspect.  I think print sales will stabalise soon and maybe even increase.  Most people just don&#8217;t find reading online a great pleasure &#8211; the computer still has that awkward and annoying slight control over the user &#8211; scrolling, clicking, &#8216;not responding&#8217; etc.  You cannot lie down in a comy position with a wacking great laptop on your bed/in your bath.</p>
<p>As for nifty hand held thingys &#8211; too expensive &#8211; and who wants to read The NYT on a five inch screen &#8211; blah!</p>
<p>I went and bought the Economist today, and the Guardian.  Why?  Because I had a thirst for something with depth and quality &#8211; all within my control, in my hands.  The pleasure of reading them online would be not pleasurable at all.  </p>
<p>Thus &#8211; allthough current sales and doom mongers reflect otherwise &#8211; print will always be in demand.</p>
<p>There you go, sorted &#8211; lol!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/01/lets-decide-newspapers-or-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=592#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>Be interested to hear your take on his comments about iPlayer.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Dan’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sumption.org/2009/01/05/social-networking/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;social networking&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be interested to hear your take on his comments about iPlayer.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Dan’s last blog post..<a href="http://www.sumption.org/2009/01/05/social-networking/" rel="nofollow">social networking</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Barlow</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2009/01/lets-decide-newspapers-or-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveleejblog.com/?p=592#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>Democracy but the problem is that the online model doesn&#039;t support the revenues that are required to support quality journalism Dave.

I am not a Luddite,online will be the future,what form it takes I am not sure of ,but it must be a viable business model without the printed word</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democracy but the problem is that the online model doesn&#8217;t support the revenues that are required to support quality journalism Dave.</p>
<p>I am not a Luddite,online will be the future,what form it takes I am not sure of ,but it must be a viable business model without the printed word</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

