My RSS feeds aren’t working too well. So I’m testing them.
Archive for 2008
Just checking a few RSS issues
October 31st, 2008Selling the BBC licence fee to the public (and Terry Tibbs)
October 30th, 2008
A few media commentators have used the Brand/Ross fall out to take swipes at the BBC licence fee. I fear it’s a debate that will escalate even more now that Jonathan Ross has been suspended for 12 weeks, an admission that the presenter got it very, very wrong.
I feel I’ll struggle to show objectivity with this post, given my current career developments, but hopefully people who know me can verify that my admiration of the BBC has existed for a long time — not just in the past few weeks.
When I taught in New Zealand, I introduced the BBC website as being the greatest news organisation on earth. Several students expressed their envy at not having such a well-respected public broadcaster on their own shores.
So why do I constantly come across opinion pieces, comments and blogs rallying fiercely against the £131.50 yearly fee? Do we really believe it isn’t good value for money?
The fact that we pay the wages of both Brand and Ross seems to have added an unwelcome fuel to this current fire. Anyone resents having to pay compulsory fees for anything; even something we enjoy as much as television and radio. Surprisingly, though, millions upon millions of us think nothing of paying the fee amount three for four times over to receive Sky Sports. Ironically, if the licence fee were higher, BBC Sport would be able to compete in that arena too.
It’s not often I agree with Noel Edmonds, but a while ago he made a terrific point about the BBC licence fee. Here it is (from the Independent):
Edmonds claimed his one-man protest was against the corporation’s “we know where you are” ad campaigns against those who didn’t have a TV licence, which he argued were threatening.
Spot on my shoddy-shirt wearing friend. The TV Licensing adverts are disgusting. They’re said in the same grumped-up tone as the adverts on benefit fraud. The psychology is all wrong. The BBC shouldn’t just be telling payers that they have to pay, they should be shouting about why it’s good to pay. What am I getting? Where’s the benefit? Where does my fee go?
Fonejacker — brilliant show about, topically enough, prank calling — has a wonderful character named Terry Tibbs. Terry is your old-school business man. And, ridiculous as he is, he could have some choice words when it comes to persuading people that the licence fee is worth it. In one sketch, he says this about buying a car:
“Hang about. Look. We’re not talkin’ money jus yet. Alright? I wanna know a bit more about the car before we get into that. Come on, you gotta seduce me. You don’t just jump into bed with Terry Tibbs. You take Terry Tibbs out to lunch. You wine and dine him. You give him an oil massage, and then he gives you nineteen-fifty, if you’re lucky.”
Now while that may just be an excuse to mention Terry Tibbs in a blog post, I think if the BBC imagined Terry when pushing TV licence adverts, there’d be a lot more enthuasiasm for our public broadcaster.
Rather than: “We’ll find you.” They should be saying: “Look what you’re getting, isn’t it brilliant?”
Yesterday, I visited a friend in Norwich. While I was there, I went to the wonderful new BBC building. In it was a library, cafes, studios… loads of stuff. Around the floor, stalls sold products for charity or small business. It was packed out — on a Wednesday. It’s just one small example of the goodness an organisation like the BBC can bring.
Think of the licence fee as a tax on a nation’s intellectual well-being. We pay tax to keep our roads in order. We pay tax to keep our health service running. Personally, I think a tax that ensures knowledge, entertainment and world class journalism is just as valid. Let’s never forget how important it is.
Sure, you may not like Russell Brand. That’s fine. Millions of people, however, do like Russell Brand, making the money paid for his services justified. The same can be said for Jonathan Ross, too.
I don’t like Cash in the Attic all that much, but I don’t object to my licence fee going towards it because I know many people do.
If we can get the public to understand all the goodness that comes from the BBC licence fee, then the battle to regain faith is almost complete. The first step is some positive fee-related adverts. Seduce me.
Russell Brand: Analysis or overkill?
October 30th, 2008Wowzers. Take a look at this list of stories on the Russell Brand fiasco, all taken from Media Guardian. There’s 49 in total — and that’s before the inevitable truckload of posts that will follow now that Brand has resigned. I predict we’ll hit the 100 mark by the end of the week.
None of the links I’ve added here have been online for more than four days. Can anyone honestly say there has been this many developments? I don’t think so.
There’s analysis, and then there’s just anal. Enough of this madness.
Web-savvy standup with a licence to thrill and offend
Puerile prank that left BBC stars and executives on the ropes
Suited and booted: fall and rise of a showman
Patrick Barkham on Russell Brand’s ‘Hare Krishna’ chant and temple visits
Georgina Baillie: the Satanic Slut at the centre of the Ross-Brand controversy
Video: Russell Brand quits as BBC radio host
John Harris: What they did was grotesque
Andrew Sachs: profile
Russell Brand resigns from BBC as Jonathan Ross apologises for ‘juvenile remarks’
Video: Andrew Sachs on Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand: ‘I’m not collecting apologies’
Maggie Brown: Suspension is not enough for Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand
Broadcast rules should have saved BBC
In pictures: ‘Sachsgate’ – who’s who in the BBC hierarchy
Media Monkey: more from Sachsgate
‘Sachsgate’ – who’s who in the BBC hierarchy?
Loads more after the jump…
» Read more: Russell Brand: Analysis or overkill?
links for 2008-10-27
October 28th, 2008-
The power of the internet. Will this guy get MMS on the iPhone? He gets my vote.
-
Google Earth on the iPhone. Drool. Now if only they fitted the thing with a good camera and video making functions, I might be tempted to get one.
-
How we used to live. Looks fun…
-
The brains they are a-changin'. Heavy web use = loss of brain functions, and could lead to Attention Deficit Disorder.
-
Interesting audio snippet from Radio 4 about how the BBC is using bloggers to produce news.
What do you call a man hiding in a bush? Russell.
October 27th, 2008Poor Russell Brand. Or perhaps not.
I often say that people are quick to tread on Russell Brand because they don’t like him. And that dislike ends up clouding their ability to judge if something was offensive or not — much in the same way that many of the Big Brother complaints after the whole Shilpa Shetty affair wanted the show to be pulled. Not because of the alleged racism and/or bullying, but because they just didn’t like it.
Likewise, I have to concede that I could be guilty of the opposite. I think Russell Brand is one of the smartest comedians we Brits have ever had the pleasure of producing. My love for his work may getting in the way of admitting that his phone call stunt was way out of line.
links for 2008-10-26
October 27th, 2008-
"An Arkansas television anchorwoman died Saturday, several days after she didn't answer her wake-up call and was found beaten in her home, hospital officials said. "
links for 2008-10-25
October 26th, 2008-
'"We've got from now to the end of the year to figure out what adjustments we have to make," Willse said. "We will be able to produce an abundance of good stories. We will still have a good paper but we have to figure out exactly how to accomplish that."'
Blue Square are an embarrassment to football
October 25th, 2008The Blue Square Premier division — formerly the Football Conference, the 5th tier of English football — is not known for high-standards on the pitch.
But it wouldn’t be unfair to expect professionalism off it.
Yet, the league’s sponsors, Blue Square, seem hell bent on making it hard for themselves.
All through last season, fans from Blue Square Premier (BSP) clubs were taking part in local keepy-uppie competitions. Two fans would go on to compete in the final at Wembley, taking place the same day as the playoff final.
So far, so good, and the prize money was a massive £100,000 for the winner, plus £20,000 to his favourite BSP team.
It got to final day. The two keepy-uppie hopefuls were led onto the pitch to compete one last time. But, and here’s the crucial bit, the competition was changed. No longer was man vs man in keepy-uppie. Nope! Instead, each person had to try and kick a ball into a blue square. The players were one penalty area, the box was on the half way line.
In short, while not impossible, it was very, very, difficult. Believe it or not nobody won the prize, and the £120,000 stayed in the pockets of Blue Square.
Both clubs complained about the game, and Blue Square responded:
“Although the final game was difficult, it wasn’t impossible, and from a Blue Square point of view the prize money was insured to the extent that a winner would have been more beneficial to the overall competition. We were genuinely cheering on every single finalist in the hope that they would manage to scoop the prize.”
I bet you were.
But wait, there’s more.
Over on their official BSP website, their journalists have been hard at work. Yup, hard at work getting things wrong.
Take a look at this: a cock-up of epic proportions. Here’s what went wrong:
1. The journalist used the internet as his/her sole source, and didn’t fact check
2. The website wasn’t a news outlet, but one maintained by a football fan at Rivals.net.
3. The football fan in question supports Cambridge United — and the article focuses on the money troubles of Histon FC. So, the fan would have no inside links there (presumably. And you’d check, wouldn’t you?)
4. Histon FC and Cambridge United are fierce rivals. They are about 10 miles apart, if that.
So the journalist used an unverified source, from a website written by a fan of a rival club. Great work.
The saga gets deeper when you realise that the apology was made after a complaint from Histon — rather than the journalist finding out it wasn’t false. The importance of that? I’d say it’s unfair to brand a website, even a fan-written one, as inaccurate if you don’t actually check.
But, on the plus side, the site reports today that one of Cambridge’s top strikers, James Constable, has been called up the the England C squad.
Shame that James Constable in fact plays for Oxford United, and has never played for Cambridge in his life.
Nevermind.
[EDIT: The James Constable error has been corrected. I wonder if they check the web to correct their errors too?]










