Archive for 2008

Just checking a few RSS issues

October 31st, 2008

My RSS feeds aren’t working too well. So I’m testing them.

Selling the BBC licence fee to the public (and Terry Tibbs)

October 30th, 2008

A few media commentators have used the Brand/Ross fall out to take swipes at the BBC licence fee. I fear it’s a debate that will escalate even more now that Jonathan Ross has been suspended for 12 weeks, an admission that the presenter got it very, very wrong.

I feel I’ll struggle to show objectivity with this post, given my current career developments, but hopefully people who know me can verify that my admiration of the BBC has existed for a long time — not just in the past few weeks.

When I taught in New Zealand, I introduced the BBC website as being the greatest news organisation on earth. Several students expressed their envy at not having such a well-respected public broadcaster on their own shores.

So why do I constantly come across opinion pieces, comments and blogs rallying fiercely against the £131.50 yearly fee? Do we really believe it isn’t good value for money?

The fact that we pay the wages of both Brand and Ross seems to have added an unwelcome fuel to this current fire. Anyone resents having to pay compulsory fees for anything; even something we enjoy as much as television and radio. Surprisingly, though, millions upon millions of us think nothing of paying the fee amount three for four times over to receive Sky Sports. Ironically, if the licence fee were higher, BBC Sport would be able to compete in that arena too.

It’s not often I agree with Noel Edmonds, but a while ago he made a terrific point about the BBC licence fee. Here it is (from the Independent):

Edmonds claimed his one-man protest was against the corporation’s “we know where you are” ad campaigns against those who didn’t have a TV licence, which he argued were threatening.

Spot on my shoddy-shirt wearing friend. The TV Licensing adverts are disgusting. They’re said in the same grumped-up tone as the adverts on benefit fraud. The psychology is all wrong. The BBC shouldn’t just be telling payers that they have to pay, they should be shouting about why it’s good to pay. What am I getting? Where’s the benefit? Where does my fee go?

Fonejacker — brilliant show about, topically enough, prank calling — has a wonderful character named Terry Tibbs. Terry is your old-school business man. And, ridiculous as he is, he could have some choice words when it comes to persuading people that the licence fee is worth it. In one sketch, he says this about buying a car:

“Hang about. Look. We’re not talkin’ money jus yet. Alright? I wanna know a bit more about the car before we get into that. Come on, you gotta seduce me. You don’t just jump into bed with Terry Tibbs. You take Terry Tibbs out to lunch. You wine and dine him. You give him an oil massage, and then he gives you nineteen-fifty, if you’re lucky.”

Now while that may just be an excuse to mention Terry Tibbs in a blog post, I think if the BBC imagined Terry when pushing TV licence adverts, there’d be a lot more enthuasiasm for our public broadcaster.

Rather than: “We’ll find you.” They should be saying: “Look what you’re getting, isn’t it brilliant?”

Yesterday, I visited a friend in Norwich. While I was there, I went to the wonderful new BBC building. In it was a library, cafes, studios… loads of stuff. Around the floor, stalls sold products for charity or small business. It was packed out — on a Wednesday. It’s just one small example of the goodness an organisation like the BBC can bring.

Think of the licence fee as a tax on a nation’s intellectual well-being. We pay tax to keep our roads in order. We pay tax to keep our health service running. Personally, I think a tax that ensures knowledge, entertainment and world class journalism is just as valid. Let’s never forget how important it is.

Sure, you may not like Russell Brand. That’s fine. Millions of people, however, do like Russell Brand, making the money paid for his services justified. The same can be said for Jonathan Ross, too.

I don’t like Cash in the Attic all that much, but I don’t object to my licence fee going towards it because I know many people do.

If we can get the public to understand all the goodness that comes from the BBC licence fee, then the battle to regain faith is almost complete. The first step is some positive fee-related adverts. Seduce me.

Russell Brand: Analysis or overkill?

October 30th, 2008

Wowzers. Take a look at this list of stories on the Russell Brand fiasco, all taken from Media Guardian. There’s 49 in total — and that’s before the inevitable truckload of posts that will follow now that Brand has resigned. I predict we’ll hit the 100 mark by the end of the week.

None of the links I’ve added here have been online for more than four days. Can anyone honestly say there has been this many developments? I don’t think so.

There’s analysis, and then there’s just anal. Enough of this madness.

Web-savvy standup with a licence to thrill and offend
Puerile prank that left BBC stars and executives on the ropes
Suited and booted: fall and rise of a showman
Patrick Barkham on Russell Brand’s ‘Hare Krishna’ chant and temple visits
Georgina Baillie: the Satanic Slut at the centre of the Ross-Brand controversy
Video: Russell Brand quits as BBC radio host
John Harris: What they did was grotesque
Andrew Sachs: profile
Russell Brand resigns from BBC as Jonathan Ross apologises for ‘juvenile remarks’
Video: Andrew Sachs on Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand: ‘I’m not collecting apologies’
Maggie Brown: Suspension is not enough for Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand
Broadcast rules should have saved BBC
In pictures: ‘Sachsgate’ – who’s who in the BBC hierarchy
Media Monkey: more from Sachsgate
‘Sachsgate’ – who’s who in the BBC hierarchy?

Loads more after the jump…
» Read more: Russell Brand: Analysis or overkill?

My new job at the BBC (and what it means)

October 29th, 2008

Today I spent my first day with the BBC Future Media and Technology team. From 4th November I will be co-editor of the BBC Internet Blog, a behind the scenes take on how the BBC is trying to keep on top of technological developments in news gathering, production and publication.

Exciting times. I can’t begin to describe how much I’m looking forward to shedding some ideas across the BBC. Hopefully I can make an impact.

We already have some pretty cool projects on the go. I’ll be posting more about those at another time. What I’m looking to mention quickly now is what I hope to achieve with my work on the BBC Internet Blog. And, as I’ve done in every step of my career, I’d like to draw on the blogosphere’s input.

My main aim, and one that is shared enthusiastically by everyone I’ve met at the Beeb so far, is to immerse the BBC actively into social media. We do it well already, I reckon, but we can still come leaps and bounds to best make use of what’s out there.

I’ll be aiming to ramp up the use of del.icio.us and other similar services, so long as it’s useful to readers.

I’ll be looking for ways to help organise all the personal output from BBC journalists. There are loads of brilliant bloggers at the BBC who write in an extra-curricular fashion. I think this content needs to be publicised heavily. Why? Because it’s informative, it’s useful and, when we consider who funds the BBC, it’s very important. Not to mention interesting.

All in all, I think I use some of my own knowledge to ramp up efforts with social media. And the BBC Internet Blog is the best place for it to begin. Suggestions welcome in the comments or by email.

If you’re wondering where this leaves jBlog, well fear not. I still have free reign to post here however I please. I am yet to read the blogging guidelines, but I’m told they are very reasonable.

And finally, I’d like to publically thank Martin Stabe for getting me involved with this position.

links for 2008-10-27

October 28th, 2008

What do you call a man hiding in a bush? Russell.

October 27th, 2008

Poor Russell Brand. Or perhaps not.

I often say that people are quick to tread on Russell Brand because they don’t like him. And that dislike ends up clouding their ability to judge if something was offensive or not — much in the same way that many of the Big Brother complaints after the whole Shilpa Shetty affair wanted the show to be pulled. Not because of the alleged racism and/or bullying, but because they just didn’t like it.

Likewise, I have to concede that I could be guilty of the opposite. I think Russell Brand is one of the smartest comedians we Brits have ever had the pleasure of producing. My love for his work may getting in the way of admitting that his phone call stunt was way out of line.

Twitter Charts: When do you tweet?

October 27th, 2008

I’m normally the last to find these online tools, but Twitter Charts is an interesting one, I think.

It shows, in beautiful graphic format, what days of the week, and what times, any given username posts Twitter updates.

You can see mine by clicking below:

Twitter activity

My results don’t show any great times of heightened activity, although some spurts can be explained simply. Saturday at 3pm, for example, where I often text Cambridge United-themed updates as and when we score/concede etc.

And you’ll also see I’m a bit of a night owl. I’ve made more tweets at 2am than I have at midday.

What does your Twitter Chart say about you? Try it here.

links for 2008-10-26

October 27th, 2008

links for 2008-10-25

October 26th, 2008

Blue Square are an embarrassment to football

October 25th, 2008

The Blue Square Premier division — formerly the Football Conference, the 5th tier of English football — is not known for high-standards on the pitch.

But it wouldn’t be unfair to expect professionalism off it.

Yet, the league’s sponsors, Blue Square, seem hell bent on making it hard for themselves.

All through last season, fans from Blue Square Premier (BSP) clubs were taking part in local keepy-uppie competitions. Two fans would go on to compete in the final at Wembley, taking place the same day as the playoff final.

So far, so good, and the prize money was a massive £100,000 for the winner, plus £20,000 to his favourite BSP team.

It got to final day. The two keepy-uppie hopefuls were led onto the pitch to compete one last time. But, and here’s the crucial bit, the competition was changed. No longer was man vs man in keepy-uppie. Nope! Instead, each person had to try and kick a ball into a blue square. The players were one penalty area, the box was on the half way line.

In short, while not impossible, it was very, very, difficult. Believe it or not nobody won the prize, and the £120,000 stayed in the pockets of Blue Square.

Both clubs complained about the game, and Blue Square responded:

“Although the final game was difficult, it wasn’t impossible, and from a Blue Square point of view the prize money was insured to the extent that a winner would have been more beneficial to the overall competition. We were genuinely cheering on every single finalist in the hope that they would manage to scoop the prize.”

I bet you were.

But wait, there’s more.

Over on their official BSP website, their journalists have been hard at work. Yup, hard at work getting things wrong.

Take a look at this: a cock-up of epic proportions. Here’s what went wrong:

1. The journalist used the internet as his/her sole source, and didn’t fact check

2. The website wasn’t a news outlet, but one maintained by a football fan at Rivals.net.

3. The football fan in question supports Cambridge United — and the article focuses on the money troubles of Histon FC. So, the fan would have no inside links there (presumably. And you’d check, wouldn’t you?)

4. Histon FC and Cambridge United are fierce rivals. They are about 10 miles apart, if that.

So the journalist used an unverified source, from a website written by a fan of a rival club. Great work.

The saga gets deeper when you realise that the apology was made after a complaint from Histon — rather than the journalist finding out it wasn’t false. The importance of that? I’d say it’s unfair to brand a website, even a fan-written one, as inaccurate if you don’t actually check.

But, on the plus side, the site reports today that one of Cambridge’s top strikers, James Constable, has been called up the the England C squad.

Shame that James Constable in fact plays for Oxford United, and has never played for Cambridge in his life.

Nevermind.

[EDIT: The James Constable error has been corrected. I wonder if they check the web to correct their errors too?]