Archive for July, 2008

Sign up now for the young journo blogging ring

July 30th, 2008

A week or so ago I wrote a blog brainstorming a few ideas for a young journalist blogging ring. It was inspired by Jessica DaSilva, the rather brave intern who blogged her way into a bit of a nightmare, but then pretty much blogged her way into a glistening career at the same time. Wonderful, I thought.

Anyway, it made me realise that I don’t really know many young journalists that are bloggers. Apart from either friends who I’ve bullied into starting blogs, or some of my NZ students…. who I’ve bullied into starting blogs too :-D

So here’s the deal. John Thompson, from journalism.co.uk, has set up a new section of the site for our ring. It’s a Wordpress-powered site (woo!), which we can all sign up to and post to.

Now I know what you’re thinking: Can’t I just post on my own blog and then get the lovely link traffic?

Feel free — I’ll be doing it with my posts, for sure. However, by posting onto journalism.co.uk I think this will become an effective, managed resource that can be searched and archived in one sole location, thus making a sort of young-journalist knowledge bank on the web. And of course, let’s not disregard the clout journalism.co.uk has in the online journo world. There are few places better suited to hosting all of this stuff.

One of the concerns from my original post was exclusivity. I suggested — wrongly — that I (and others) pick and choose bloggers who had already made a name for themselves on the web. Wrong. How would that work? The whole reason for this idea coming into existence was because of Jessica…. who I’d never heard of. So to exclude bloggers who weren’t already famous from contributing is just a really stupid idea. Thanks to all who made the point perfectly clear via comments and emails. We’re debating already!

But there will be some restrictions. We need to keep this focused in order to make it useful and interesting.

So, to take part in the Journalism.co.uk Young Journalist Blog Ring, you will have to be:

a) Under 30-years-old. I know there will be a couple of disappointed people out there with this restriction, but without it I feel we lose the point a bit.

b) You blog (or plan to blog) about journalism in some shape or form. Bit of an obvious one, this, but I think it’s important that we’re all coming from the same place here. I’m not bothered what stage of you’re career you’re at, so long as that career’s journalism.

c) You promote the ring! If we all bring attention to this by shouting it from the rooftops, then there’s no reason why this can’t become the best point for young opinion on the media on the web.

Finally… I can’t write ‘the ring’ without thinking of that horrible Gollum chap. So, anyone who can come up with a good, catchy name wins… wins… your very own DVD copy of Batman: The Dark Night!* Wow!

So, if you’re interested, please email me: davelee.mail@NOSPAMgmail.com . Obviously, want to be removing that NOSPAM bit. If you’ve already emailed me, please do it again… I don’t want to miss anyone out, and my Gmail inbox is busier than a Barack Obama gig campaign rally.

I’d like to add, of course, that any suggestions are still very welcome as to how the ring should work. I’ve set those three requirements as a means of getting the ball rolling. But please, ideas wanted!

(*Which you can redeem by waiting until it is released, going to the nearest DVD store and handing over your money. Tee hee hee.)

How to be a good journalism student

July 24th, 2008

One of my best students in NZ has posted this cheeky video about being a good journalism student. Enjoy…

Ain’t that great? Read Luke’s blog here.

On a serious note, I made sure that everything I taught my students could be achieved with free, easily available tools. Audio was done with Audacity, slideshows with Soundslides and video with Windows Movie Maker.

Sure, Movie Maker would never be good enough for broadcast epics, but the value of allowing students to expand their creative minds by playing around at home should never be taken lightly.

Compare this approach to the ‘book an hour and then get out’ approach of many j-schools and decide which you prefer.

Like all good things in life, online journalism education should be kept free and easy.

Spelling the masthead wrong? We sure feel silly

July 23rd, 2008

How on EARTH did this happen?

The bashing together of young journalism heads

July 15th, 2008

Every month I take part in the Carnival of Journalism. It’s a fun little event where a selection of invited bloggers bash their collective heads and write about journalism. It’s been especially good in recent times, as there has been a set question to answer for all of the bloggers.

Think of it as an enclosed meme on your favourite subject.

Anyway: I had an idea. After reading the wonderful tale about Jessica DaSilva, and having been a long-time reader of MerandaWrites, I thought it would be a stellar idea to start a blog ring — just like the Carnival — but specifically for young journalists.

Only a handful, mind you. The ring will be invitation-only: The bloggers will have already made a bit of a name for themselves. I think, collectively, the group could hold some power. We are, after all, the future of the industry. Wouldn’t you be interested in what we’re up to?

After posing the idea on Twitter, John at Journalism.co.uk got in touch to say they’d be interested in hosting it. So, in the spirit of all things bloggery, I’m now putting the idea to everyone:

Who should be in it?
What should we be writing about?
Would you read it?
Should the ‘age’ be based on life age, or years of experience?

I look forward to seeing what you all think.

Introducing NewsWire: If you run a journalism school, you need to do this

July 8th, 2008

NewsWire.co.nz is the new news website for the Whitireia Journalism School, New Zealand.

I built it. And, aside from the fee for hosting (pennies) and my own personal wage, we did it for FREE. And what’s more, it’ll stay free.

We created and launched the site within THREE WEEKS. That includes setting up the hosting, domain name, content management system, design, editorial structure, promotion and publishing software. Oh, and lets not forget that students creating the content have been training as journalists for less than six weeks.

I’ll cut to the chase: IF YOU RUN A JOURNALISM SCHOOL, YOU NEED TO DO THIS TOO. IT IS TOO EASY TO NOT BOTHER.

The simplicity of the operation is staggering. Using a series of free, open-source tools, we have created a multi-media news website that is already involving the community.

Now, when I was putting all this together, I constantly referred to the work of Mindy McAdams. Her how-to guides have meant some very tricky aspects of the teaching — setting up Audacity, for example — were made a lot simpler.

Now it’s one thing for Mindy to create those sorts of guides for her own students, but it’s another thing altogether to put those resources on the web, for free, for everyone to learn from.

So, inspired by Mindy’s example, I’ll explain everything that went into NewsWire.co.nz. Maybe some other journalism schools can follow Whitireia’s lead.

» Read more: Introducing NewsWire: If you run a journalism school, you need to do this

Me on Radio New Zealand’s Mediawatch

July 7th, 2008

Yesterday, I shared the bill with Paul Bradshaw on Radio New Zealand’s Mediawatch program.

Paul was discussing Jolly Journalists — of which I am one! — and I was interviewed about my trip here in New Zealand, but also about online journalism in general. I hate myself on the radio (don’t we all?) but I think the show’s a pretty good listen.

Click here to listen to the clip (Windows Media Player). Paul’s bit is 13 minutes in, and I’m on after that at about 19 minutes in.

Must point out this blog isn’t “award-winning” as Colin describes, although if anyone wants to give me an award… then you’re more than welcome :-D

Hyper-local is dead. It’s time for hyper-personal

July 1st, 2008

What is hyper-local? News that is close to us, yes?

Well ok then, but what exactly is ‘local’? One thing’s for sure: It’s geographic.

And by God, isn’t that boring? I don’t want hyper-local news unless it’s interesting. But then what is interesting? We shouldn’t assume people find news interesting just because it is near to them.

This is all obvious, of course. But you wouldn’t think it when you read about all the hyper-local sites that seem to be springing up all over the place with the intention of forcing down news ‘closer to you’ down our guts.

Instead, we should be harnessing all the Web 2.0 power into hyper-personal.

Hyper-personal is the people I know, the teams I support, the musicians I like. It’s more of the news I’m interested in, and less of the news that I’m not. It’s the bloggers that post from the other side of the world — but are still relevant to me. It’s a news agenda that I can tailor to my needs and my needs alone. Do I want to follow the twists and turns of Zimbabwe politics? Yes please. Do I want to know each detail of the McCann case? No thanks. Do I want to know the current status of Amy Winehouse’s beehive? Maybe.

Do I want those decisions to be made by anyone else that isn’t me?

No.

I don’t want hyper-local. I want hyper-personal. And it’s up to newspapers to take social-networking’s lead and give me what I need.

Hyper-local and hyper-personal both mean news that is close to you. But hyper-personal looks beyond geography, and in doing so, finds stories that really are close to us.

Some queer goings on at OneNewsNow.com

July 1st, 2008

This has made my day.

In current affairs this morning — we spend half an hour each morning discussing the news — we were chatting about FairFax’s decision to axe a pub-full of sub-editors from some of its papers. This was in addition to yesterday’s news from the UK that City AM has decided to remove the subs’ desk altogether in a cost-cutting masterstroke.

Well the typo-ed Guardian article that I pointed out in that post shows that single humans can’t be trusted with subbing copy. And now some quite glorious proof that machines can’t be trusted with snubbing out errors either. This gem of an entry from the brilliant Regret the Error blog explains that the over-cautious chiefs over at OneNewsNow didn’t ever want to use the word ‘gay’ when referring to a homosexual. How best to achieve this small detail? Simple: Use a machine to change it automatically! Genius!

Genius, that is, until a rapid young chap named Tyson Gay won a race.

He suddenly became Tyson Homosexual when the site’s filter got a hold of an AP story. Boing Boing has a screen grab of the hilarity:

But perhaps the best part of the story was this:

Asked how he felt, Homosexual said: ‘A little fatigued.’

I don’t think this post needs anymore words, do you?