<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labour of Love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveleejblog.com/2007/11/labour-of-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2007/11/labour-of-love/</link>
	<description>Fresh ideas for online journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lee / jBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Five things that can make a newspaper website absolutely postively wonderfully great</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2007/11/labour-of-love/comment-page-1/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lee / jBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Five things that can make a newspaper website absolutely postively wonderfully great</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 02:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-lee.org/jblog/?p=214#comment-633</guid>
		<description>[...] may not hold much gravitas against some of the big opinions out there, but with my impending trip to New Zealand in May, I thought it&#8217;s about time I started actively collecting some thoughts on online [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may not hold much gravitas against some of the big opinions out there, but with my impending trip to New Zealand in May, I thought it&#8217;s about time I started actively collecting some thoughts on online [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2007/11/labour-of-love/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-lee.org/jblog/?p=214#comment-634</guid>
		<description>Interesting, Adrian. Will get myself a copy of the Baker&#039;s book to give it a read.

Starting to wonder if my dissertation should just be on the Hutton Inquiry alone (it&#039;s currently just a chapter).

Anyway, cheers for your info. I&#039;m about to start writing a post about my thoughts on Gilligan, but it&#039;s late so I may not finish it for a little while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, Adrian. Will get myself a copy of the Baker&#8217;s book to give it a read.</p>
<p>Starting to wonder if my dissertation should just be on the Hutton Inquiry alone (it&#8217;s currently just a chapter).</p>
<p>Anyway, cheers for your info. I&#8217;m about to start writing a post about my thoughts on Gilligan, but it&#8217;s late so I may not finish it for a little while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Monck</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2007/11/labour-of-love/comment-page-1/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Monck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-lee.org/jblog/?p=214#comment-637</guid>
		<description>From Richard Norton-Taylor&#039;s review of Norman Baker&#039;s book:

Baker points to an incident during Kelly&#039;s appearance before the Commons foreign affairs committee shortly before he died. Kelly was unsettled, the author agrees, by a detailed question from the Liberal Democrat MP David Chidgey, about a conversation the weapons expert had with the Newsnight science editor, Susan Watts. Kelly evaded the question, thus misleading the committee.

Kelly &quot;would be exposed as less than truthful, something that went strongly against his personal ethic&quot;, writes Baker. &quot;He thus took a sudden decision to end it all.&quot; This, according to him, is the &quot;most plausible&quot; explanation for Kelly&#039;s suicide. Surprisingly, what he does not say is that Kelly was asked about Watts after Chidgey had been briefed by Gilligan. The question, which Kelly was to remark later had &quot;totally thrown him&quot;, contained material that Gilligan had supplied in an email to Chidgey. The Hutton inquiry was told that such email priming by Gilligan of Chidgey was unprecedented and &quot;highly inappropriate&quot;. Baker passes over this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Richard Norton-Taylor&#8217;s review of Norman Baker&#8217;s book:</p>
<p>Baker points to an incident during Kelly&#8217;s appearance before the Commons foreign affairs committee shortly before he died. Kelly was unsettled, the author agrees, by a detailed question from the Liberal Democrat MP David Chidgey, about a conversation the weapons expert had with the Newsnight science editor, Susan Watts. Kelly evaded the question, thus misleading the committee.</p>
<p>Kelly &#8220;would be exposed as less than truthful, something that went strongly against his personal ethic&#8221;, writes Baker. &#8220;He thus took a sudden decision to end it all.&#8221; This, according to him, is the &#8220;most plausible&#8221; explanation for Kelly&#8217;s suicide. Surprisingly, what he does not say is that Kelly was asked about Watts after Chidgey had been briefed by Gilligan. The question, which Kelly was to remark later had &#8220;totally thrown him&#8221;, contained material that Gilligan had supplied in an email to Chidgey. The Hutton inquiry was told that such email priming by Gilligan of Chidgey was unprecedented and &#8220;highly inappropriate&#8221;. Baker passes over this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2007/11/labour-of-love/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-lee.org/jblog/?p=214#comment-636</guid>
		<description>To be honest ... I have no idea yet! I&#039;ll get back to you. Although on first thoughts, I think Gilligan took a very gutsy move by breaking the Iraq Dossier story. After all, the allegations were pretty much spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest &#8230; I have no idea yet! I&#8217;ll get back to you. Although on first thoughts, I think Gilligan took a very gutsy move by breaking the Iraq Dossier story. After all, the allegations were pretty much spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Monck</title>
		<link>http://daveleejblog.com/2007/11/labour-of-love/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Monck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 10:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-lee.org/jblog/?p=214#comment-635</guid>
		<description>&quot;I find myself instinctively disagreeing&quot; - come on Dave - what are your grounds!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I find myself instinctively disagreeing&#8221; &#8211; come on Dave &#8211; what are your grounds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

