Archive for July, 2007

Citizen Journalism: What are we afraid of?

July 30th, 2007

Steve Outing writes about citizen journalism here. There are, he says, 11 layers to citizen journalism that if carried out correctly will lead to a healthy news experience for all involved. Even the journalists.

Step one is to allow your readers to add comments. Simple. I do that here (although comments are a bit sparse on this blog. Hint.), and so do a lot of news sites — but only in moderation. Why not, Steve says, allow comments on letters pages, on calendars, on everything? That’s a truly interactive experience.
Down the other end of the advice ladder is step 11: WikiNews. It’s, as he says, a bit of a “way out there” plan, but if users of Wikipedia can create a reliable(ish) encyclopedia, then surely the same type of user can handle writing news? Yeah, I’m undecided on that one too.

I’m a fan of citizen journalism. If managed correctly, it’s brilliant. Better than conventional journalism, certainly. What I don’t like, though, is when professional journalism parades itself around pretending to be citizen journalism when it clearly isn’t.

The BBC is guilty of this.

News stories do not, generally, have comment facilities. Why not?

The ‘Have Your Say’ section is kept away from the news in its own little corner of the website. Yes, keep it in one place, but it can be integrated further.

Worst of all is this: Your News.

This isn’t citizen journalism. Many editors seem to fall into the trap of marginalising citizen journalism stories into the sort you’d find dug deep down on a regional news bulletin.

“Oh look, here’s a sick dog!” or “We had a sports day! Yippee!”

Patronising, boring rubbish.

Citizen journalism can be used to do great things. Get footage that journalists can’t even dream of. So why is it being wasted? What are we afraid of?

Good Reads: Has the crisis at the BBC damaged Britain’s favourite TV bulletin?

July 30th, 2007

Excellent media section in the Independent today. Here are my picks.

Ian BurrellHas the crisis at the BBC damaged Britain’s favourite TV bulletin?

This article’s biggest crime is perhaps the fact that it doesn’t really answer its own question. However, it’s an interesting look behind the scenes of a program (and it’s a program, not a bulletin, apparently) that has been forced into change.

Huw Edwards (right) takes center stage. His ‘bowser problem’ — he wasn’t sure of the word bowser as people may have not known what they meant — is a clever little anecdote that goes to show how intricate a news bulletin has to be. Make the crucial mistake of losing your audience in your first 40 seconds and you’ll never recover.

But they needn’t worry. The BBC 10 o’clock news had ratings peaking at 6.3 million last week.

Stephen Glover on the Press – TV coverage of the floods verged on red-top exaggeration

Hurrah! The voice of reason. Contrary to popular belief, England isn’t actually flooded from tip to toe. Which is a shame for our journalists, says Stephen.

In the second half of his column, he goes on to discuss Gordon Brown’s relationship with the Daily Mail: “Cynics will say Mr Brown is merely trying to keep it on side. He is aware of its power in Middle England, where he seems to be enjoying something of a honeymoon.”

I don’t think it’s a big issue. Papers don’t control public opinion as much as they once did. The Daily Mail is the least of Gordon’s worries, I’m sure.

Top 10… Journalists with Facebook groups dedicated to them

July 27th, 2007

Cracking post over on the Press Gazette Axe Grinder blog this week: Top 10… Journalists with Facebook groups dedicated to them.

In first place, a personal favourite, Jon Snow (left). At number seven, Piers “I’m a complete tosser but Dave won’t say anything TOO bad about me because he doesn’t want to ruin any future career paths” Morgan with the best group: “I fucking hate Piers Morgan”.

Which you can join here.

In other less-fun news, this post by Roy Greenslade gives a fairly solid voice of reason over the Daily Mirror’s bomb story that went completely wrong.

A lot of commentators have said the journalists should not be prosecuted. They were acting in the public interest, supposedly. It’s a tough one. One comment on the Greenslade blog makes the point that if there are doctors and pilots involved with terrorism groups then of course, there could be journalists too. Making a journalist exempt from the terrorism act is giving the go ahead to them all.

What should happen is a government body is informed that a journalist will be doing this, so that if he is caught, everyone can get a pat on the back safe in the knowledge it was just a bit of role-play and they all did well.

Only problem with that is that I wouldn’t trust the body not to tell the security forces responsible in order to save face. But then we have to keep them on their toes.

Tough one.

One more thing: All these blogs are meant to be pretty good. I haven’t got round to reading them yet — apart from Mindy McAdams’ — but I will do.

Oh, and another thing (sorry). I’m in ‘talks’ (ok, I sent an email and they said maybe) with our university radio station about setting up a podcast network to go with the newspaper I founded last year. This would, if I’m not mistaken, make us the first university in the UK (world?!) to have it’s own podcast website produced by students. Any advice?

BBC reversal not the first occurrence

July 27th, 2007

The BBC got a good belting from the Royal Family a week or so ago after it made a trailer that seemed to show the Queen storming out of a photoshoot. In fact, the clip was of the Queen coming in to the shoot, not out of it.

The BBC offered a groveling apology and promised it wouldn’t happen again.

Nigel Barlow, a mature student at UCLan, has posted this news that he spotted in The Guardian this week.

Charlie Addiman (Letters, July 14) points out that no apology or correction was offered when BBC news reversed the order of events at Orgreave in 1984, screening shots of miners throwing stones at police before showing mounted officers charging the miners. In 1991, though, in response to a complaint by Charles Alverson of Cambridge, Martin Hart, on behalf of the then BBC director general, acknowledged that the film had been reversed. Hart claimed: “It was a mistake made in the haste of putting the news together … an editor inadvertently reversed the occurrence of the actions of the police and of the pickets.” No inquiry. No measures to ensure it doesn’t happen again. No public admission.

Give us a Kiss

July 25th, 2007

Remember me telling you the other day that you should never mix your personal life with your journalism stuff if you’re a blogging student?

Well I take it back. A little. If you’re cool enough, you can get away with it, just like Jemima Kiss.

It’s the greatest blog design I’ve ever seen (even though it is a tincy bit wide).

Put on your blogging boots

July 23rd, 2007

This is a guest post I wrote for FreelanceWritingTips.com.

THEY say blogs have been around for ten years now, writes Dave Lee. Some would say it’s even longer than that, but as it stands, no-one really agrees on when the first blog started. And, even after all this time, no-one can agree on how useful they are either.

Linda Jones (who, the observant ones will have realised, is one of the people behind this site) was once cautious about how useful a blog can be to an aspiring journalist.

In Press Gazette last year, she wrote, amongst other things: “What can aspiring journalists learn from blogging? Meeting deadlines? Possibly. Interview skills or news sense? I think not.”

I agree, but that’s not to say a blog can’t be a student journalist’s trump card when it comes to breaking a new market. Linda wrote that article a year ago, so maybe her opinions have altered a little, but in my experience blogging has been the deal clincher in just about everything I’ve done.

Think of this scenario. You’re interested in, say, shoes. You read Shoe Mag every month and you think you’ve got a great idea for an article. You prepare to email or call the editor of Shoe Mag with your idea when all of sudden you realise that not only do you not have any experience with Shoe Mag, but you don’t have any experience with any mag. You’re stuffed.

But wait. You’ve been blogging about shoes for the past two months. You’ve attracted shoe fans from all over the world to your work, and even other shoe bloggers are linking to your blog. “Ah ha,” thinks the editor. “Even though this student hasn’t worked for a magazine before, they really do know about shoes, this blog is great.”

And there you have it. You’re in.

Of course, this doesn’t just apply to shoes. The trick is to find something you know about, and stick to it. Don’t meander, or you’ll lose your readers.

I used to blog about everything in my life in the one place. Nights out, girlfriends and football used to occupy the same space as my journalism articles. Big mistake. Have a personal blog, by all means, but only let editors see you at your writing best. Now I only blog about issues relating to the media and more specifically student media. After less than a year, my blog has brought me opportunities in magazines, local newspapers and even national ones.

My friend Dan took up blogging this year after relentless pestering. After a few posts about his beloved Blackburn F.C, he was soon snapped up by theoffside.com as their official Blackburn blogger. He can now say he’s a sports journalist specialising in Blackburn F.C. – because that’s what he is.

In a nutshell: Get blogging. There will be something you love, so write about it. Comment on other people’s blogs too, and they’ll have look at yours. I could go on for hours about how to promote your blog, but really, the key is just make it GOOD. And don’t be afraid to show it off.

Linda was right when she said having a blog doesn’t make you a journalist. Football boots don’t make you Alan Shearer, but you’ve got a better chance by putting them on.

Dave Lee is a student journalist studying at the University of Lincoln, where he founded and currently edits the student newspaper, The Linc. He also writes for several publications, specialising in new media, technology, social-networking and student media.

Not that I’m hinting or anything

July 20th, 2007

But there are now ads on my page. Figured lots of blogs make a few pence on Google Adsense, so thought I’d try and have a go too.

Feed me.

Anywhere but here

July 18th, 2007

I’ve added a new category today. ‘Multimedia’ will act just like the Good Reads category. Any decent bits of multimedia I find from newspapers around the world will be posted.

I’ll start off with this from The Times (South Africa).

This piece is a triumph on several levels.

Firstly, the story itself is wonderfully portrayed. They could have just presented this man as a normal interview, buried in the news section or maybe features. It would have passed me, and many people, completely by.

Creating a multimedia show like this is an effective way of reaching the reader/viewer in a far more direct way. Not only do I know about this man’s plight, but I’ve heard him talk about it too. It feels more real.

Secondly, the way I found out about this piece is a sign of things to come. Was it via a news website? Or a TV program? Nope. A Facebook message from the newspaper pointed me in the right direction. The Times in S.A is an example to everyone when it comes to reader interaction. If you get the chance, it’s worth reading a few posts from editor Ray Hartley’s blog too.
And finally, a little thing this, but it was quick and simple to watch. No pop-up BBC style media player. It was in my browser, it loaded as I watched, and the quality was great.

Great work guys!

Prince the Pioneer

July 15th, 2007

Music history made today, folks!

Prince’s new album, Planet Earth, was given away FREE with the Mail on Sunday today.

And what great stuff it is too. The funkiest album I’ve heard in ages. He’s not the greatest guitarist on earth, but he plays like no-one else can.

What is great about ‘Planet Earth’ is that it could be the beginning of a new way of being an artist. Essentially, the CD a promo for his live shows that start soon at the O2 dome in London (I’ve got my ticket, have you?). Prince will make his megabucks by performing LIVE.

Just like in the old old days, musicians will be judged on how good they are at performing. They are, after all, ‘performance artists’. No longer will Paris Hilton be able to have an album super-produced to make her sound good.

Talk about leveling the playing field.

Excuse me, Michael Grade, but I think you’re wrong

July 14th, 2007

“We are all vulnerable. We are in an age today where there has been a huge influx of young talent into the industry as it expands. They have not been trained properly, they don’t understand that you do not lie to audiences at any time, in any show – whether it’s news or whether it’s a quiz show. I feel sorry for the BBC.”

- Michael Grade, Executive Chairman, ITV.

I read the above quote in the Independent today. I could yap all night about why I think Michael Grade is wrong here, but I feel it’s a bit too predictable. After all, I’m a young journalism student. Of course I’m going to disagree with him. He has, for lack of a better phrase, dissed ma homies.

He is laying the blame over this fiasco on young, inexperienced talent at the BBC. The BBC, thankfully, is happy to agree that yes, a lot of its workforce is young. Good thing too, young people provide new ideas. With that, they bring a youthful zest that, in some instances, can get ahead of their sense of responsibility.

Despite this, however, is it right to say that young journalists “have not been trained properly”? Well, yes, I think it is. But then who’s training them? You’ll never be a good journalist until you are a practicing one. You can learn as much as you like, but until your in a real-life pressure situation, you can never know what the feeling is to be a real journalist. So, although I agree with him to a point, I feel it is the responsibility of media companies like the BBC, ITV et al to make sure they tune our skills to the level they’re after. Not chuck the blame when something goes wrong. If a building falls down, do you blame the building apprentice?
The comment I object to is: “They do not understand you do not lie to audiences at any time.” Please, Mr Grade, do not be daft. To think we’re not aware of the rights and wrongs of the broadcast world is very insulting. It borders on the painfully ironic too — Mr Grade and his peers are from the generation of journalists that will be remembered for losing the publics’ trust in the media.

There are two scenarios that I think could have happened regarding the trailer for the program. Perhaps the editor/producer in question got overexcited. The dream of a scoop whizzed around in his/her mind and temptation was too great, and, sadly for them, they let it cloud their judgment.

Or, it was an honest mistake.

Either way, it was one that should have been well and truly destroyed when it got to the senior editors at the BBC.

What is happening here is that ratings-chasing has led a rush to out-scoop each other. Mr Grade patronisingly says he “feels sorry” for the BBC. Personally, I feel sorry for Mr Grade. So clouded is his judgment is that he can’t see that everyone is to blame for events such as this. Blame the young by all means, but only when it’s justified. Coming from a broadcaster that would report the death of a village cat as “Cat murder happy-slap culture crisis” (or something…), I tend not to trust Mr Grade’s opinion all too much.