Archive for March, 2007

Who watches Channel Four News?

March 27th, 2007

We had another guest lecture at Uni yesterday. Dorothy Byrne, Head of News and Current Affairs, gave a talk on “The need for ambition and risk in TV”.

An interesting session – she made some great remarks about coverage of certain areas such as science and Northern Ireland politics. N.I in particular being very topical due to the events yesterday which, I was shocked to find out, didn’t get as much coverage in the UK press as I’d have hoped.

The Indepedent tried its damnedest to make a dramatic front page, with the title “The Hands of History” and pictures of famous political handshakes through the years. This fell flat on its face, though, when it reminded readers that Ian Paisley and Gerry Adams didn’t actually shake hands at all.

Having the majority of my family in Ireland, this news has extra resonance, and I very much hope it is the beginning of something very positive for Norhern Ireland.

Back to the guest lecture. Dorothy is clearly very good at her job. She knows what makes good journalism, and more importantly, she knows what doesn’t. Her talk convinced all in the room, I’d imagine, that Channel Four’s news and current affairs output is nothing short of sensational.

But it really isn’t.

You see, the problem with Channel Four is that no matter how hard it tries, and no matter how good its news programs are, it will still never get over the fact that they are Channel Four. By this I mean that in amongst all the other programs it shows (which, admittedly, are normally very good) the news just doesn’t have the same weight that it does from the BBC, or even ITV.

It’s no good putting great journalism in between Hollyoaks and Wife Swap – it alienates people. Channel Four bosses realise this, I’m sure, as More4 launched last year to muted anticipation. A hefty advertising campaign — mainly focusing on a documentary on what would happen if George Bush was to be assassinated — meant early interest, but I can’t name anything that’s been on there since.

Even the name ‘More4′ suggests that it’s simply more of the same old thing.
A lecturer at our Uni, Richard Keeble, asked Dorothy a question about coverage of politics in Africa. He suggested there wasn’t enough – a statement that Dorothy quickly put down. There has been shows about Africa, she said. Sadly, Richard had never seen it. Which proves my point again that no-one really watches Channel Four News.

The same happened again when Nick Nuttall, another lecturer, admitted to not watching Dispatches either.

What a shame it is that Channel Four News is wasted. Especially since they have on their team one of the greatest journalists of our generation, Jon Snow.

British Press Awards

March 26th, 2007

The British Press Awards are being blogged live tonight over on the Press Gazette Blog.

Guardian Unlimited will sweep up, I predict. Times for sport. Telegraph for columnists (even though I hate them).

UPDATED: It appears I’m a bit of a plum. ‘Press’ obviously means printed media. So Guardian Unlimited doesn’t count, of course.

Newspaper of the year is The Observer!

Hmmm. Nice touch. But then I always see the Sunday papers as more magazines than newspaper.

At least the Daily Mail didn’t win.

Podding along

March 20th, 2007

Good read on The Guardian’s Editor Blog today. It asks whether anyone actually listens to podcasts. I think no, not yet, but eventually they will.

The article has taught me a new word too: smorgasbord. Love it.

A right hungry chap

March 14th, 2007

Nothing beats a productive day. Up at half seven (YES!) and arrived in time to Roger De Bank’s Newspaper Production workshop.

Anyway, it was full steam ahead. I was early enough to have the time to grab a quick bacon roll from the Uni canteen. A wonderful decision, as my measly few pence stretched to a very filling two rasher sarnie. The woman behind the counter gave me a free rasher because, in her words I “look like a right hungry chap”.

So that set me up. My friend John Rooney was off ill, which meant we were lacking in an editor for our assessment. Usually, on a Tuesday morning, I’m anything but ‘up for it’, but today I was on a screamer. Coral* and I whipped up a tabloid page that we can really be pleased with – and it looked the tits. Excuse my vocab there.

And it didn’t stop there. Oh no. After a debacle a few weeks ago over the university newspaper I founded, I am absolutely ecstatic to say that it will return soon.

I’ve had to make sacrifices, though. I’ve realised now that I can no longer rely on the journalism department to pay its bills on time. Sad, but true. So, instead, I’ll be editing a paper that is features-led, much like the New York Times segment in The Observer.

It will raise many new challenges. Ones that I’m looking forward to overcome.

And lets hope that Alan Johnson returns home safely.

* Possibly the nicest name for anyone ever. Lovely.

Pictures of the Year International

March 11th, 2007

I have huge respect for photographers. I think it’s because I can now appreciate just how difficult it is to take a good photo; whereas I didn’t before. This website has the Pictures of the Year award winners. Worth looking at – if only for five minutes.

These are my favourites:

Everyone loves Leopard Seals. It must be an amazing feeling to be that close to nature.
The grief in this picture staggers me. It seems so far away, yet so close to home. I’m reading a book at the moment called The Rules of Life. It’s full of utter tosh mainly, but it’s a really good inspirational read. In it, there is one part about how different people are actually completely the same. We all want to be loved and to fall in love. We all worry if we’re getting a bit fat, but still look forward to having that dinner that we really shouldn’t because it’s so unhealthy. This picture seems more shocking to me when I put it in those terms.

This one isn’t quite as depressing. Great energy in this. I bet we all wish we could spend our days just doing that. The old lady just strolling past tops it off for me.

Boris

March 6th, 2007

Sometimes I wonder how the man who seems so foolish on television comes across as a speaker of immense sense when he writes.

A cracking piece by Boris Johnson in The Guardian today.

Jambo Number 5

March 5th, 2007

David James, I salute you.

The Guardian and its Sunday sister The Observer have an infatuation with celeb columns lately. Well, most places do – Owen Hargreaves being one we all love to hate, I’m sure – but those two take the mick.

Russell Brand. Great comedian, bad columnist. Every Saturday, he gets a huge big space so he can talk about how much of a West Ham fan he is. Brilliant.

David James is another. Normally, he’ll spend his words bigging himself up as some sort of messiah-footballer, out to save the fans from the nasty world of Premiership profits.

He even has a little “The fee for this article has been donated to charity”. In tackiness terms, that ranks up there with Sir Alan’s: “That’s why my fee for this ad has gone to the Great Almond Street Children’s Hospital.”

However, Dave ‘Jambo’ James was actually on top form today. A great article about lazy money-obsessed footballers.

But it’s still rubbish. Get them off.